lite version
Started by chrisi


Rate this topic
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


3 posts in this topic
chrisi
Junior Member
**


0
1 posts 1 threads Joined: Feb 2007
02-08-2007, 07:55 AM -
#1
would the already existing plugin technology makes it possible to get a very lite (basic) tlb? there are so many options now. sometimes there is only a small difference between bloatware and high configurable.

1 there is a fine small app
2 many users love it
3 many users want many new features
4 fine small app is bloatware now
5 users are looking for a new fine small app
6 goto 1

see miranda im, irfanview etc.

please don´t kill me Smile i don´t wanna stopp the technological progress
Xyzzy
Member
***


0
91 posts 28 threads Joined: Mar 2006
02-09-2007, 02:46 AM -
#2
Just what exactly is your point? Does TLB take too much resources of your PC?

Number of options doesn't make application fat. Poorly implemented features do.

You take number of items in configuration dialogs as a measure of program efficiency. Mind this, if there were only 1/10th options avaliable, TLB would work exactly the same, just being less... configurable.

If you want lighter TLB, get FreeLaunchBar.

X.
Q Section
Weapons Я Us
*****


0
899 posts 100 threads Joined: Feb 2003
02-09-2007, 05:03 PM -
#3
Xyzzy - Well said.

chrisi - Please see definition of bloatware here
HMSS Q Section
click here for 30+ ideas from a Special Plugin List
some examples=
UV Index Monitor, Allergy Monitor, TLB Version Monitor, Cinema Monitor
Visualise World Righteousness
Semper Ad Fundum
Working for the Secret Intelligence Service


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)