Wireless Monitor 1.4 plugin not detecting card in Vista!
Started by gate1975mlm


Rate this topic
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


13 posts in this topic
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
01-31-2007, 04:26 AM -
#1
The Wireless Monitor 1.4 plugin does not detect my Wireless card in Windows Vista! Any ideas what's wrong? I hope this will be fixed soon Smile
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


10
6,208 posts 429 threads Joined: Jan 2002
01-31-2007, 06:23 AM -
#2
Yes, I've reproduced this bug. It appear only when you are using the native Vista drivers. I'm working on fixing this problem.
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
01-31-2007, 06:32 AM -
#3
Yuri Kobets Wrote:Yes, I've reproduced this bug. It appear only when you are using the native Vista drivers. I'm working on fixing this problem.

Super thanks a lot Smile
Guest
Guest


 
02-10-2007, 06:25 PM -
#4
Yuri Kobets Wrote:Yes, I've reproduced this bug. It appear only when you are using the native Vista drivers. I'm working on fixing this problem.
I am using the manufacturer's drivers and the plugin does not list my wireless card.
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
03-06-2007, 12:51 PM -
#5
Yuri Kobets Wrote:Yes, I've reproduced this bug. It appear only when you are using the native Vista drivers. I'm working on fixing this problem.

Any update when this will be fixed? Confusedhock:
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
04-21-2007, 07:01 AM -
#6
I really wish this will be fixed soon. I use a Buffalo PCI Wireless card and they do not offer Drivers yet for Vista so I have to use the ones from Microsoft update which of course do not work with Wireless Monitor 1.4 plugin.

Are we getting any closer to this being fixed? Or am I just going to have to wait for driver from Buffalo which might never come.
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


10
6,208 posts 429 threads Joined: Jan 2002
04-24-2007, 06:47 AM -
#7
I've found the way to fix this bug on the Vista. Currently I'm working on updating Wireless Monitor. Maybe I'll add some new features as the Vista allow it.
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
04-24-2007, 06:49 AM -
#8
Yuri Kobets Wrote:I've found the way to fix this bug on the Vista. Currently I'm working on updating Wireless Monitor. Maybe I'll add some new features as the Vista allow it.

Sounds Great Yuri Kobets you are the best! Smile
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


10
6,208 posts 429 threads Joined: Jan 2002
04-25-2007, 11:09 AM -
#9
Please can you test this version of Wireless Monitor. It works fine on my computers but I must be sure before release.

New feature: by default on click WM opens Connect to a network wizard (on Windows Vista only).
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
04-25-2007, 11:15 AM -
#10
Yuri Kobets Wrote:Please can you test this version of Wireless Monitor. It works fine on my computers but I must be sure before release.

New feature: by default on click WM opens Connect to a network wizard (on Windows Vista only).

Just tried it and works great on my Vista PC!





Thanks alot Smile
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
04-25-2007, 12:39 PM -
#11
One Issue why does Data Encryption: TKIP/AES say (Key is absent)?

I don't remember it saying (Key is absent) when I ran Windows XP.

I have password protected my router using AES so why am I getting a red X and (Key is absent)?
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


10
6,208 posts 429 threads Joined: Jan 2002
04-25-2007, 03:52 PM -
#12
Well, I've published version 1.5 The bug with encryption sate must be fixed.
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
gate1975mlm
Senior Member
****


0
487 posts 90 threads Joined: Dec 2004
04-25-2007, 03:56 PM -
#13
Yuri Kobets Wrote:Well, I've published version 1.5 The bug with encryption sate must be fixed.

Indeed it is Smile

Big thanks again!


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)