Mail Monitor: "Precedence: bulk" - missing field in filter rules

Hi all.

Yuri, I have just received a spam-email containing "Precedence: bulk" in its header.
It would be nice to include "Precedence" as one of the fields to check in the filter rules.

...
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 05:39:14 -0700
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_106449128130467"
...

Might be better if you made these Mail Monitor suggestions in the Mail Monitor 2.0 thread started by cmishima rather than a new thread for each one.

http://www.tsoftcentral.com/cgi-bin....0;t=932

Hi Doug Smith.

I thought about adding it to the 2.0 suggestions thread, but then thought it could have been an oversight from Yuri and could quickly and simply be added to another release of v1.9.

To a moderator: if you think it should have been posted there in the first place, please feel free to move it.

Just write Precedence into field text box

Wow, cool.

Thanks for the tip, Yuri.

So if I understand correctly, we could actually write the name of fields that are not already included in the selection box, right?

So if I understand correctly, we could actually write the name of fields that are not already included in the selection box, right?

Yes! There are too many fields that can be included. Most of them are non-standard. So it is impossible to include ALL fields but you always can write any field.

Excellent!!

Thanks again.