Mail Monitor: "Precedence: bulk" - missing field in filter rules
Started by Denis


Rate this topic
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


7 posts in this topic
Denis
Member
***


0
192 posts 19 threads Joined: Dec 2002
09-25-2003, 06:25 AM -
#1
Hi all. Smile

Yuri, I have just received a spam-email containing "Precedence: bulk" in its header.
It would be nice to include "Precedence" as one of the fields to check in the filter rules. Wink
Quote:...
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 05:39:14 -0700
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_106449128130467"
...
Doug Smith
Member
***


0
218 posts 21 threads Joined: Jul 2001
09-25-2003, 09:18 AM -
#2
Might be better if you made these Mail Monitor suggestions in the Mail Monitor 2.0 thread started by cmishima rather than a new thread for each one.

http://www.tsoftcentral.com/cgi-bin....0;t=932
Denis
Member
***


0
192 posts 19 threads Joined: Dec 2002
09-25-2003, 09:27 AM -
#3
Hi Doug Smith. Smile

I thought about adding it to the 2.0 suggestions thread, but then thought it could have been an oversight from Yuri and could quickly and simply be added to another release of v1.9.

To a moderator: if you think it should have been posted there in the first place, please feel free to move it. Wink
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


8
6,183 posts 427 threads Joined: Jan 2002
09-25-2003, 09:53 AM -
#4
Just write Precedence into field text box Wink
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
Denis
Member
***


0
192 posts 19 threads Joined: Dec 2002
09-25-2003, 10:01 AM -
#5
Wow, cool. Big Grin

Thanks for the tip, Yuri. Smile

So if I understand correctly, we could actually write the name of fields that are not already included in the selection box, right?
Yuri Kobets
Posting Freak
*****


8
6,183 posts 427 threads Joined: Jan 2002
09-25-2003, 10:14 AM -
#6
Quote:So if I understand correctly, we could actually write the name of fields that are not already included in the selection box, right?
Yes! There are too many fields that can be included. Most of them are non-standard. So it is impossible to include ALL fields but you always can write any field.
The TORDEX Team
http://www.tordex.com
Denis
Member
***


0
192 posts 19 threads Joined: Dec 2002
09-25-2003, 10:25 AM -
#7
Excellent!! Big Grin

Thanks again. Smile


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)